首页> 外文OA文献 >Safety and efficacy of nabumetone in osteoarthritis: emphasis on gastrointestinal safety
【2h】

Safety and efficacy of nabumetone in osteoarthritis: emphasis on gastrointestinal safety

机译:萘丁美酮在骨关节炎中的安全性和有效性:强调胃肠道安全性

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Aim: To compare the efficacy and gastrointestinal (GI) safety of nabumetone with two comparator non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), diclofenac SR and piroxicam. Methods: Two randomized, double-blind, multicentre, parallel group trials were carried out in patients with moderate to severe osteoarthritis of the hip or knee. During the 6 month treatment phase, the safety and efficacy of nabumetone (1500-2000 mg/day) was compared to diclofenac SR (100 mg/day) or piroxicam (20-30 mg/day). GI safety was evaluated by reviewing all adverse events reported during the trials and presenting all cases of ulcers (complicated and uncomplicated), as well as other bleeding events that may have been associated with NSAID administration. Results: Most of the efficacy parameters showed no significant differences between the NSAIDs, although diclofenac SR was significantly better than nabumetone in one of 18 efficacy parameters. Nabumetone-treated patients experienced significantly fewer ulcer and bleeding events compared to patients treated with the comparator NSAIDs [1.1% (4/348) vs. 4.3% (15/346), P = 0.01]. Bleeding events, including outright upper or lower GI bleeding or a significant decline in haemoglobin, occurred in significantly fewer patients treated with nabumetone than with the comparator NSAIDs [1.1% (4/348) vs. 3.5% (12/346), P <0.05]. More importantly, complications associated with either ulcers (perforation) or bleeding (leading to hospitalization or withdrawal) occurred in significantly fewer patients receiving nabumetone [0% (0/348)] than with comparator NSAIDs [1.4% (5/346), (P <0.05)]. Conclusion: The results suggest that nabumetone was similar in efficacy by most criteria to diclofenac SR and piroxicam in relieving the symptoms of osteoarthritis; however, nabumetone's GI safety profile was generally superior to that of both comparator NSAIDs. In the pooled analysis, nabumetone was associated with a significantly lower total incidence of ulcers and bleeding events, and a significantly lower incidence of complications associated with these events.
机译:目的:为了比较萘丁美酮与两种比较类非甾体类抗炎药(NSAIDs),双氯芬酸SR和吡罗昔康的疗效和胃肠道(GI)安全性。方法:对中度或重度髋或膝骨关节炎患者进行了两项随机,双盲,多中心,平行组试验。在6个月的治疗阶段,将萘丁美通(1500-2000 mg /天)与双氯芬酸SR(100 mg /天)或吡罗昔康(20-30 mg /天)的安全性和有效性进行了比较。通过回顾试验期间报告的所有不良事件并报告所有溃疡病例(复杂和不复杂)以及可能与NSAID给药有关的其他出血事件,评估了胃肠道安全性。结果:尽管18种功效参数之一中双氯芬酸SR明显优于萘丁美酮,但大多数功效参数在NSAID之间没有显着差异。相较于使用NSAIDs治疗的患者,用萘丁美酮治疗的患者发生的溃疡和出血事件明显减少[1.1%(4/348)对4.3%(15/346),P = 0.01]。相较于比较者NSAIDs,用萘丁美酮治疗的患者发生出血事件(包括完全上消化道或下消化道出血或血红蛋白明显下降)的发生率[1.1%(4/348)比3.5%(12/346),P < 0.05]。更重要的是,与比较NSAIDs组[1.4%(5/346)]相比,接受萘丁美酮[0%(0/348)]的患者发生溃疡(穿孔)或出血(导致住院或戒断)的并发症明显多于( P <0.05)]。结论:结果表明萘丁美酮在缓解骨关节炎症状方面在大多数标准上与双氯芬酸SR和吡罗昔康相似。然而,萘丁美通的胃肠道安全性通常优于两个比较者的非甾体抗炎药。在汇总分析中,萘丁美酮与溃疡和出血事件的总发生率显着降低,以及与这些事件相关的并发症的发生率显着较低。

著录项

  • 作者

    Scott, D L; Palmer, R H;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2000
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号